Hi Arsenij,
What I also have found is this paper, where my idea of an mvc design is
also captured: http://www.ksi.edu/seke/Proceedings/seke11/166_Lei_Zhang.pdf
Look at table 1. There are several situations or patterns. I remember a
siuation during my implementation: I had my manager, which was responsible
to collect action awareness information. There, I called the
MultiUserChatService to print the action awareness information in the MUC
(remember? ;)). There, I created a ChatElement object and injected it into
the service, which was not even a hack, it was also a convention violation.
The reason: I created a ChatElement manually, independent from the XMPP
messages, and injected this into the MUC model. Or summarized: In my
manager, which was just responsible for retrieving and distributing
information, I edited a model and printed something.
What I want to explain: An MVC-like pattern can be used and if this were
used, I would not have been allowed to edit a model from my 'action
awareness distributor' (which can be let's say the C-part).
Cheers,
Damla
2014-11-13 18:29 GMT+01:00 Arsenij E Solovjev <xeper...@gmail.com>:
>
> And here's how an exemplary reply to this my mail looks like *wink *wink
>
> -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [DPP-Devel] Introducing
> Archnemesis/Chralx Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:53:39 +0100 From: Damla
> Durmaz <ddurma...@gmail.com> <ddurma...@gmail.com> To: Arsenij E
> Solovjev <xeper...@gmail.com> <xeper...@gmail.com> CC:
> dpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <dpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> <dpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>
>
> Hey Arsenij,
>
> Firstly, very nice feature you work on. Secondly, I just can tell from
> my experience what I think of two important things.
>
> * During my development in my thesis, I sometimes made the same mistake
> again and again, thus not calling some piece of code from the SWT thread if
> it is needed. I mean, if there are such one- or bidirectional rules, they
> could also check if someone is calling something from the UI component,
> where in most cases it must be called from the SWT thread. I don't know,
> how complicated this would be and if it is even possible in the way I
> think. But it is just an idea (also for the 'Ausblick' part of your thesis
> ^^). I don't know it this issue is a frequent one in the Saros development
> but I think an important one.
>
> * Another rule was inspired from the MVC pattern. Is it possible to
> collect components into new components (component ui + x + y is the 'V'
> pattern/patternComponent, component concurrent + ? + .. is the
> controller/controllerComponent). It then looks like a tier application.
>
> These are just ideas. Even when they are not realizable or unusual
> perhaps they may be inspiring.
>
> Cheers,
> Damla
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
> Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
> Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
> Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> DPP-Devel mailing list
> DPP-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpp-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
DPP-Devel mailing list
DPP-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpp-devel
