Franz wrote:
> OK, Stefan, here's is your chance: What do you propose?
> Please share your conception on how to proceed in this manner.
Stefan wrote:
> I already told Tobias just to continue his stuff. You can then integrate
> this stuff. Take this V2 versions as a "polished" version
> of this overhaul.
I'm sorry, but I have no clue what this means.
@Tobias: Do you know how to "just continue your stuff"?
"You can then integrate this stuff" --
who is "you",
what does "integrate" mean here (usually it's: 'push a patch,
work on your reviewer's comments, eventually submit the patch'),
and what precisely is "this stuff"?
Stefan wrote:
> Tobias patch can be reviewed since 19th April. You do
> not have written a single comment since then regarding his patch.
That is not helpful.
I don't see how this line of argument brings us any closer to finding
a way to clean up the filesystem "stuff".
(For what's it worth: I do not review patches that do not pass the CI,
unless I have a good reason to do so, e.g. being directly asked by
the patch author.)
After all: This is a communication issue between you and Tobias.
Stefan wrote:
> I do not get your point. I have no grudge against you.
I was referring to this quote of yours:
> Well, just look at the patches (the abandoned one) containing my name.
> Sometimes Franz already revert some of my features. It is
> frustrating but you have to deal with it.
As frustration is counterproductive, I wanted to know what's going here.
Stefan wrote:
> just look how many LOCS I have thrown away by
> myself a.k.a just because I have written a bunch of code does not mean
> it was a good approach etc. to do it that way.
True.
But it's a completely different type of frustration to throw away one's
own work compared to waking up and seeing one's work being invalidated or
at least being put into a position where the next steps are less than clear
-- and that's how I understood Tobias's position
("this patch has somewhat put me in an awkward position").
He explained his concerns, you caused this situation and so far,
you did very little to address his concerns.
(@Tobias: Stop me if I'm wrong on this one.)
So, to move forward:
Please share your thoughts on how the filesystem should be reworked.
Not only in terms of the desired outcome product-wise, but also
regarding the process how to get there:
Which parts (existing classes/packages, patches-under-review, ...) are
to be worked on by whom and in which order?
We need a common understanding of this -- to the very least, you and
Tobias.
Franz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
DPP-Devel mailing list
DPP-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpp-devel
