Bugs item #3510991, was opened at 2012-03-25 03:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by franzzieris
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=843359&aid=3510991&group_id=167540

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
>Category: Screen-sharing
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Alexander Waldmann (netcorps)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Remove + Rework screensharing completely

Initial Comment:
The only scenario in which the screensharing is technically working with 
acceptable performance is when the user has xuggler installed and configured.
Xuggler no longer maintains windows binaries, so users would have to compile 
xuggler themselves which no one will do. 

The screensharing is a usability catastrophe and features 10+ severe usability 
issues, including privacy related problems. It fails to work for most users and 
when configured it does not work reliably.

I propose removing this feature and reintroducing it later when it was 
reimplemented properly. I cannot believe there is even one users that is 
actually depending on this feature  who  would complain about the removeal, 
because there are many free tools available for screensharing that work way 
better than this piece of code.

The user experience and the trust in the quality of saros is dramatically 
reduced by experimental features that simply don't work for most users and work 
annoyingly bad if they manage to configure it. For a commercial software that 
would be inacceptable.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Franz Zieris (franzzieris)
Date: 2012-05-23 09:06

Message:
This is not a "7", so I lowered it to my favorite level "5". In my
understanding an "experimental feature" can have some severe issues (both
technical and UX) without losing the status of a "feature".

@netcorps: Concerning your "commercial software" argument: Do you mean
software, that somebody has to pay money for, or software that is used in
commercial settings?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=843359&aid=3510991&group_id=167540

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Dpp-robot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpp-robot

Reply via email to