Bugs item #2596430, was opened at 2009-02-13 08:29 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by freyther You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=843359&aid=2596430&group_id=167540
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Main Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed >Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch (marrin) Assigned to: Christoph Jacob (chris_fu) Summary: Unrealiable and delayed selection information Initial Comment: Selection information was not transmitted or displayed reliably. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2009-03-18 11:55 Message: This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christoph Jacob (chris_fu) Date: 2009-02-16 06:56 Message: @Marrin: Yes, it was a problem with the ConsistencyWatchdog. Fixed in rev. 667 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christopher Oezbek (coezbek) Date: 2009-02-15 16:50 Message: New implementation of revealing is more robust, when looking at large chunks of code. rev.663 Also added some new code for scrolling optimistically, which should be commented out for the test on Friday though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christopher Oezbek (coezbek) Date: 2009-02-15 15:04 Message: Reduced flickering by using replaceAnnotation rev.662. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christopher Oezbek (coezbek) Date: 2009-02-15 14:36 Message: I did some work on this in rev.658 by rewriting the optimize method. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch (marrin) Date: 2009-02-14 11:34 Message: And there was an inconsistency before at the "selector"'s side which was handled by the consistency watchdog. Maybe there was something wrong with the vector time of the selection, and it was already at the partner's sides but held back due to a wrong timestamp!? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ssr (ssalinger) Date: 2009-02-14 01:56 Message: Boundary conditions: * The "selector" was in another net (via VPN). * The "selector" was driver. * The partners saw the selection ** however with big delays (20 seconds and more) ** and only for a very short time (< 1 second) ** and mostly just if it had been already deleted by the "selector" * Transferring editing steps works without problems. OS: XP Eclipse SDK Version: 3.4.1 Saros: 9.2.13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christopher Oezbek (coezbek) Date: 2009-02-13 11:15 Message: More bug-triage is necessary to pin down this problem: is it a network or presence problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=843359&aid=2596430&group_id=167540 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dpp-robot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpp-robot
