Bugs item #3512804, was opened at 2012-03-29 05:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starroli
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=843359&aid=3512804&group_id=167540

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Consistency
Group: 12.7.27.DEVEL
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: ssr (ssalinger)
Assigned to: Sebastian Starroske (starroli)
Summary: Inconsistency after an invitation

Initial Comment:
BS: Mac OS X (all three participants)
Saros: 12.4.27.120328_r3913

Activities:
1. To people are working in a session.
2. The non-host invites a third person.
3.During the invitation process, the two developers are continuing their work 
(The developers are editing a file.)

After completion of the invitation process:
- On the side of the invitee: An inconsistency is indicated.
- It is not possible to resolve the inconsistency: After correcting it is 
immediately reported back.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Sebastian Starroske (starroli)
Date: 2012-09-27 13:30

Message:
thanks a lot, I will take a look at this

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Franz Zieris (franzzieris)
Date: 2012-09-27 11:58

Message:
Correction: Stephan's problems started around 15:01, and lasted at least
until 15:13.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Franz Zieris (franzzieris)
Date: 2012-09-27 11:55

Message:
During today's acceptance test a similar behavior was observed, maybe there
is a clue in the logfiles:
http://saros-build.imp.fu-berlin.de/uat/2012_09_27/logs/

Stephan was unable to resolve his inconsistencies in file BstParser.java
around 15:13.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Franz Zieris (franzzieris)
Date: 2012-07-15 09:22

Message:
Planned for Release 12.7.27

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Donut (donut87)
Date: 2012-05-23 10:17

Message:
Yes, this actually seems to be a 'duplicate' (or another effect) of the
same bug (3458952). As I already pointed out the activities should queued
(and this was the fact before partial sharing...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Franz Zieris (franzzieris)
Date: 2012-05-23 09:22

Message:
Maybe this is a duplicate of this one: 3458952

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stefan Rossbach (kargor)
Date: 2012-03-31 13:25

Message:
I did some tests with Alex. When i refactored about 500 changes, he got
kicked after he received the archive. But we could not reproduce that
problem. Inconsitencies: Yes, but we were able to recover them. I do not
add the logs, as they are about 30 MB in size.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2012-03-31 10:35

Message:
Can you add the logs of the HOST of the session? It seems the logs are from
the peer.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: ssr (ssalinger)
Date: 2012-03-30 07:50

Message:
Logs added

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=843359&aid=3512804&group_id=167540

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Dpp-robot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpp-robot

Reply via email to