> >
> > I've attached an example of the output..  If you have any
> > suggestions/comments please send them along.
>
> 2 remarks :
>
> 1. the table layout screws up at row 7 (because of a split table
> tag) and gets somewhat better at row 112, but I see other split
> html tags (line 235 for example), probably because the lines are
> too long ?
>


hmmm...    I am hoping this could be a result of some truncating through one
of the mail servers somewhere...   most of these searches are in DOS format,
and I am processing them on UNIX....   it doesn't create a problem, but when
looking at the file on a UNIX machine, the description text can be one long
line...    Just to eliminate the possibility this unbalanced table tag could
be caused by truncating at the mail server, I zipped the searches.htm file
and attached it to this message...   Can you give it a peek and see if it
looks better?

Also note that the new page was generated with the latest searches so the
first two searches have been placed in their respective categories, and the
html will look slightly different..

Monty

>

Attachment: searches.zip
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to