John, > > Maybe we should allow for a search-by-search installation? > > Maybe there should be a more formal way of installing > searches, if they > > aren't all automatically installed... > > How about an HTTP GET-based installation? How hard would that be to > > build? You just point DQSD to a URL like this: > > I like each of these ideas. >
Me too, apart from my excessive use of "Maybe [...] should..." :) I've started working on an install command, and I'll let you know how it turns out. > So here is my proposition. Build a new rev whenever and I > will begin the work on an optional install when I get my DELL. > It can become an interim installer (same as 3.1.7 code just better installer) > or it can be ready for the 3.1.7.1 or 3.1.8 rev. That sounds good to me. We might as well go with the current installer until your new one is finished. I will try to get my act together and fix the multimonitor problem as well... I'm on vacation though, and only have one monitor at home, so no testing till Monday. Kim ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ DQSD-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
