Glenn & Brent, > > Instead of putting httpinst into search.htm, make it a > > search with it's own httpinst.xml similar to what I > > did with configure.xml.
I thought about that, but it seems a bit unnecessary to clutter the searches directory with system commands. I didn't think the overhead of loading/parsing justified the modularity... Besides, what if someone disabled httpinst!? That'd be a disaster (for my pride) ;) > Yeah! Good point. There is a framework! I sit corrected :) I think I'll build a proper search function out of it, but leave it within search.htm. I need to be able to munge parameters as well. Cheers, Kim ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ DQSD-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
