Hi Kim, > I came to my senses (hopefully) and made httpinst a > standard search XML, instead of keeping it in a > separate js include file.
Cool. :) > Also, considering the recent discussion on 'losing all > canned searches' [1], maybe we should put all the required > searches in a coresearches directory...? +1 Regards, Shawn K. Hall http://ReliableAnswers.com/ '// ======================================================== We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately. -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ DQSD-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
