Monty, Dave, I thought unattended installer just meant that it didn't ask the user for input once they'd double-clicked dqsd-setup.exe -- do you guys mean something else?
If it's just a silent installer I don't quite see the point, or is there some nice benefit I'm missing, Dave? Cheers, - Kim Monty wrote: > Personally I think this would be ideal for DQSD since the > websites used in the searches tend to fluctuate, some > searches will get broken, and fixed in CVS, but unless the > user happens to be subscribed to the users list, or unless > there is a new DQSD release, he would have no idea of the fix.. > > dg wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > A quick question for y'all (and I'm not suggesting that this should > > block the new build). > > > > How would the group feel about an "unattended" (aka > "silent") version > > of the installer? I'm new to NSIS, but I had a look at the > script last > > week and nothing grabbed my attention as being horribly problematic > > for an unattended install. I might well be wrong though - is there > > anything I should be aware of? Does anyone have any > opinions on this? > > I would be willing to have a look at modifying the script myself if > > there are no objections. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel
