The reason I wanted to keep the shortcuts was to avoid annoying anybody who had come to use the old searches regularly and would have to relearn to use the new switches. But I suppose those people that are affected could simply add the aliases back in to their own tastes. I do prefer to keep the symbol shortcuts (! for ifl , for ggn), but those can still exist without the need to have the text aliases as well.
Ryan -----Original Message----- From: Monty Scroggins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 25, 2002 6:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] run command in 2.5.8 beta 4 One of the problems with the (excellent) consolidation of the google, gg groups, gg advanced, gg uk, gg canada, etc.. is that aliases were created to redirect the searches to the gg search when the replaced searches were called - gguk for example.. Because aliases were created for this, shortcuts are now always present for gga, ggca, ggn, gguk and ifl. IMHO I think the shortcuts category should only contain aliases created by the user. With the excellent help text for the gg search, the user can easily see how to execute these searches using the switches.. I dont see a need to force 5 shortcuts on *everybody* especially since a large amount of people wont even know what the searches mean. (not everyone using the toolbar is technical).. FWIW Monty _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Monty Scroggins Broadband Data Systems Engineering (BDSE) MCI Worldcom _______________________________________________ Dqsd-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users _______________________________________________ Dqsd-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users
