Hi Kim, > However, I wonder how kosher that would be...? If GeekTools > recognized this as a problem, and took measures, maybe they > don't want to expose their service other than from the actual > web. > > I'm not sure if there is some 'DQSD code of honor', but I > suggest the gtwhois search should probably be dropped from > DQSD instead. > > Besides, there are like 7 other whois tools (? whois) > bundled with DQSD, so it's not like gtwhois is unique. > > Just my 2c - other opinions?
I agree for the most part. If someone doesn't want their site/service to be serviceable via DQSD then by all means, allow them out. But, in this case (as I think with all others) we should give them a chance. Perhaps they are unaware of DQSD - which *is* a 'geektool' - and maybe they'll provide us with the means to bypass this limitation "honorably." ;) I'll email them and ask, and post here if/when they respond. Regards, Shawn K. Hall http://ReliableAnswers.com/ '// ======================================================== We've got the best government money can buy. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601
