Heh, I had a whole answer prepared about IEEE floating-point accuracy
[1], but I thought the numbers looked OK :)

Cheers,
- Kim

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_point#Accuracy_problems

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 22:47, Tom Corcoran <tom.corco...@moonbade.com> wrote:
> Apologies guys, it made complete sense at the time...clearly I need to
> lay of the cr**k pie, damn.
>
> On 23/03/2010 21:28, Kim Gräsman wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 22:02, Tom Corcoran<tom.corco...@moonbade.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I found what looks like a Math error:
>>>
>>> 1276.595744680851/47 = 27.16161158895428
>>> 1276.6/5 = 255.32
>>>
>> My mental arithmetic is a little slow... What do you think is the problem?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Kim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users
DQSD-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601

Reply via email to