Sorry, forgot to attach the file.

Eric J. Smith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric J. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:42 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'draconet-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta
> 
> I'd like to submit the attached diff to be committed.  There are 3
> changes:
> 
> 1. Fix problem with /draco.core/scc/SvnLogParser.cs causing an extra
> revision to be included in the changes.
> 
> 2. Fix problem with /draco.core/runtime/BuildRunner.cs checking the
> LastSuccessfulBuildTime instead of the LastModificationTime.  This was
> causing Draco to keep trying to build the same code over and over and over
> again after a failed build.
> 
> 3. Add code in /service/modifications.xsl to output Yes/No for Build
> Success instead of true/false.
> 
> Thanks,
> Eric J. Smith
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:draconet-users-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erv Walter
> > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 2:46 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; draconet-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta
> >
> > The first problem is caused by an "off by one" error in the log parser
> for
> > SVN.  I fixed this by changing this line of code in SvnLogParser.cs
> (note
> > the <= instead of just <):
> >
> > // HACK: necessary since svn log always gives you the revisions
> INCLUSIVE
> > if ( date < sinceDate )
> >     continue;
> >
> > to look like this:
> >
> > // HACK: necessary since svn log always gives you the revisions
> INCLUSIVE
> > if ( date <= sinceDate )
> >     continue;
> >
> > I have not seen the second problem, but it may be related to the first
> > problem as well.
> >
> > We use draco with CVS also and I can say that the second problem does
> not
> > happen with CVS, so it is probably not a feature built into draco (to
> keep
> > rebuilding over and over).
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:draconet-users-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric J. Smith
> > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 8:13 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta
> >
> > First, I'd like to say thank you for an awesome application!!  I have a
> > couple issues I'm hoping will be resolved for the final 1.6 release.
> >
> > Whenever I commit a revision to Subversion Draco starts a build, the
> build
> > succeeds, but in the email that I get the "Modifications Since Last
> Build"
> > lists the last two commits even though the second revision was already
> > included in the last build.  So basically, it's always including one
> extra
> > revision than it should.
> >
> > Also, when a build fails, shouldn't it just wait for another commit
> before
> > trying to build again?  Right now it just keeps trying to build the same
> > code over and over and over and over.  If it failed the first time,
> > chances
> > are that until there is something new to compile, it won't succeed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eric J. Smith
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> > Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > Draconet-users mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/draconet-users
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> > Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > Draconet-users mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/draconet-users

Attachment: draco.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to