F3WT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garey, Ron,
Thanks a lot for your answers - very interesting!
73, Pierre - F3WT
Le 20 déc. 05 à 23:30, Garey Barrell a écrit :
Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the
drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pierre -
There probably isn't "one" good answer! On the surface, it seems
that crystals were/are less expensive than good filters. Early
Drake filters were only 4 pole, probably costing considerably less
than mechanical filters at the time, and had to be upgraded to 8
poles in the later TR-4s and T-4XB/C to meet more stringent FCC
signal purity requirements.
Two Filter scheme (Drake) -
1. Only one crystal required, but two "different" 9 MHz (TR-3/4)
or 5.645 MHz (T-4any) filters.
2. Suppressed carrier frequency is the same, regardless of USB or
LSB.
3. CW is obtained just by shifting the oscillator "somewhere"
within the passband of one of the filters, the shift resulting in
the "CW transceive" offset. Precise shift not critical, allowing
simple switched capacitor shift rather than another crystal.
4. Allows transceive with single patch cable between units.
One Filter scheme (Collins) -
1. Two crystals required, plus a third for CW offset (probably
because of low frequency), but only one 455 kHz filter.
2. PTO must also be shifted "exactly" the same amount as the
carrier oscillator to keep suppressed carrier frequency the same on
USB or LSB.
3. Requires patching of carrier oscillator and PTO between T and
R, complicating switching between transceive and separate control.
Drake "phase-locked" the carrier oscillator (T) and 2nd Converter
LO (R) in the C Line because the two crystal oscillators didn't
"track" perfectly over temperature variation in the earlier
models. (Color coded crystals were an "interim" fix in the late A
and B Lines.) This provided stable transceive without the
switching complication of the Collins system.
Probably other considerations that I'm not thinking of! :-)
73, Garey - K4OAH
Atlanta
Drake C-Line Service Manual
<http://www.k4oah.com>
F3WT wrote:
Hi Garey,
Very clear explanation below!
I have a related question I was wondering about for a while:
Why were TR4s - and others by he way - designed with 2 sideband
filters and 1 Xtal ( 9MHz ) rather than todays set of 1
sidebandfilter and 2 Xtals (SSB) or 3 including CW?
Was it a problem then shifting VFO without loosing stability?
73, Pierre - F3WT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Submissions: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe
drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of
message
Zerobeat Web Page: www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Submissions: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page: www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
