"Jim Shorney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I decided to bench my TR7 - a week before Field Day - to make some PA checks. I 
had perviously noticed 
a power drop-off when keyed down - most apparent on 10 meters, but affecting 
all bands. This sounded exactly like the 
symptom of predriver thermal runaway on late model driver boards as described 
by VE3EFJ in his excellent Drakemods paper 
( http://www.zerobeat.net/drakelist/drakemod/drmod122.html ).

Initial tests showed close to 150 watts CW into a dummy load on 75 meters, and 
the predriver did not seem 
to get unusually warm. 10 Meter output was 40 watts CW, dropping to 20. The 
predriver was somewhat 
warmer, but not what I would describe as hot. I implemented the emitter 
resistor mod to the predriver as 
described by VE3EFJ, but did not notice much difference.

At this point, I noticed that the CW output power had become somewhat erratic 
and unstable on some 
bands. I did a full power keydown test at this point to see what was getting 
hot and what was not. The 
predriver was not, but the PA heatsink got extremely hot - especially, it 
seemed, in the area of the drivers.  

A voltage check on the base of the driver transistors showed about .6 volts in 
RX - not good - and .7 in TX. I 
then lifted the base terminal of each driver transistor and repeated the 
measurement. The top driver 
transistor (measured with a Fluke 8050A) measured .6 V at first, but then 
quickly jumped to 13.5 V on the 
base! The bottom driver measured slightly over .6 V. Leaky drivers. Restoring 
the base connections to do 
further testing, I decided to measure the bias current of the drivers. Things 
started to really go south at this 
point. Power output had become very erratic on some bands, in some cases 
pinning the needle on the 200 
watt scale of my wattmeter  - a sign of PA oscillation. I removed the predriver 
mod, and the results 
were the same. A cool-down period with the FA-7 energized did not seem to help 
any. Oddly enough, 
driver idle current was only around 800 mA at this point, which would seem to 
meet the Drake spec.

I then removed power and did the customary ohmmeter check of each transistor, 
from base to collector. 
The bottom transistor measured as would be expected for a good transistor, 
slightly over .6 forward and full 
scale (open) reverse biased. The top transistor measured between .2 to .4 in 
both directions. I had no 
doubt that both transistors were leaky, but it was definitely confirmed for the 
top transistor.

It was time for a call to RF Parts to see if they could get me the parts I 
needed before Field Day. But it 
would have to wait until Monday (this all happened on a beautiful Saturday 
afternoon). I decided, as long as 
I was in there, to go with the full PA restoration as described by Floyd Sense 
K8AC.

Terry at RF Parts was very helpful with what turned out to be a difficult 
order. Difficult in that I don't do credit cards, and I couldn't 
wait for a Paypal bank transfer to take 5 days to clear. Once we found a 
mutually agreeable way to exchange money and parts 
rapidly, I ordered a matched pair of 2SC1969, a matched pair of 2SC2879A - the 
RoHS complaint version of the 2SC2879, 
with an Aluminum Nitrite insulator instead of the (politically incorrect) 
Beryllium Oxide - and a 2SC2166 (specified by both RF 
Parts and VE3EFJ as a replacement for the MRF476).

My parts arrived on Thursday. As PA rebuilds go, this one didn't suck. Drake 
left room to work around the PA transistors, and 
they came out easily after I loosened the hex cap screws to break the tight 
thermal contact with the heatsink. I completely 
removed the heatsink, cleaned it and regreased all the devices with that nasty 
white goop. All the resistors that I checked were 
well within tolerance. Replacement of all 5 devices that I ordered went 
relatively quickly and easily. I also reinstalled the emitter 
resistor mod in the predriver circuit.

After reassembly and checks for shorts, power output was solid and stable. I 
replaced driver bias resistor R2203 with a 100 
Ohm 1/2 watt, which brought the driver idle current down to about 240 mA. I had 
created a set of "loop terminals" in place of the 
original R2203 when I had the heatsink off, so I could swap in different values 
if needed. I didn't need to. The PA heatsink ran 
much cooler, even without the FA7 running, than before.

Power output after ALC adjustment is as follows:

160 - 110W
80 - 132W
40 - 135W
20 - 130W
17 - 110W
15 - 105W
10 - 93W

This was measured with the wattmeter in my MN2700, into a Mil surplus Bird 
gigahertz dummy load. My HyGain 421B 
wattmeter agrees closely. Power on 10 Meters was slightly lower than what Floyd 
achieved, but still better than 3 dB higher than 
before. I'm not complaining.

On thing I did not do was reverse the flow of the FA7, as has been suggested in 
several places. This just seems wrong to me 
when you consider the design as a cooling *system*. If the fan just cooled the 
PA heatsink, it would probably be OK - but the 
PA compartment is not sealed and there are gaps that allow airflow to/from the 
PA compartment and the rest of the radio. With 
the fan pulling air out, it draws a small amount of air through the whole 
radio, which helps keep the whole system at a cooler and 
more even temperature. If the fan were to blow in, some of the warm air would 
find it's way into the rest of the radio. This 
incursion of warmer air, which would vary in temperature with the transmit duty 
cycle, would make the entire radio run slightly 
hotter and potentially affect stability. All of this is unverified, but I chose 
to err on the side of caution.

The test - Field Day. The TR7 performed as expected. Power output was solid and 
reliable. Case temperature remained cool 
to the touch, and exhaust air from the FA7 never seemed more than lukewarm - 
even during long runs on 20 Meters with the 
SP7 on. Audio reports were good, except when I had the Yagi pointed west and 
was plagued with RF feedback. Bench tests 
after Field Day showed that measured power output was exactly as before.

I would like to publicly thank Floyd K8AC and Wayne VE3EFJ for their excellent 
work on the PA power output question. They 
turned what would have been a "rebuild to as it was before" into a "rebuild it 
better". Also, thanks to Thom K3HRN and Ron 
WB4HFN for providing homes on the internet for this valuable information. This 
is what's it's all about, folks!

73

-Jim
NU0C




----------------------------------------------------------------------
Submissions:        [email protected]
Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to