Thanks for the validation, Garey.  

I had to move on to some other things last night and so only got one chance to 
call someone after aligning.  I do know that the rigs were WAY off before I did 
the transceive alignment, as I kept calling guys who were 20 over and getting 
no answer, so alignment was the first thing I thought of.  I put them in 
SEPARATE and spotted them together and worked guys.

It was clever how that found that "feature" on 80m (which I had noticed before) 
to align the oscillators.  The T-4X procedure of matching the tone on opposite 
sidebands wasn't doing it for me, which was making me think this receiver was 
out to lunch.

I'll try it again after I get back home today.  If okay, I'll figure that I can 
start working on returning the AGC back to stock and putting a headphone jack 
in where the PO put the pot for this handy-dandy variable AGC delay that messes 
up the AGC's calibration.

Here's an interesting thought - and I haven't looked at the C-Line schematic 
yet (you know where I'm going...)  I'm wondering how much surgery would be 
involved to lock the carrier oscillators on the older sets a la C-Line.  I'm 
thinking it could be major -involving adding a wafer to the TRANSCEIVE switch.  
Adding spare RCA jacks would be relatively minor, as there's provision for them 
already (and so, no holes drilled).

73,

Steve, W1ES/4

-----Original Message-----
>From: Garey Barrell <[email protected]>
>Sent: Oct 3, 2011 10:13 PM
>To: Steve Wedge <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Drakelist] B-Line transceive alignment.
>
>Steve -
>
>It sounds like you are using the correct procedure.   Both BAND switches set 
>to 3.5, T-4X on SSB, 
>receiver set for 4.8 kHz and PASSBAND set to center of longest line.  Switch 
>to SPOT, and select 
>strongest USB or LSB. Peak the Preselector and RF TUNE for max.  You should 
>hear the 'tweet' sound, 
>and be able to adjust C61 for 'zero beat'.
>
>If that works ok, and still no luck, is the T-4XB on the correct sideband for 
>the band you're on?  
>T-4XB ok in TUNE mode?  If so, perhaps just not enough propagation!!
>
>73, Garey - K4OAH
>Glen Allen, VA
>
>Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
>and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
><www.k4oah.com>
>
>
>Steve Wedge wrote:
>> I was calling and calling and calling...
>> As soon as light dawned on Marblehead, I realized that the transceive 
>> alignment between my 
>> recently-acquired T-4XB and R-4B #1 (The Problem Child) was off.
>> I assumed (wrongly) that you aligned like with the T-4X - that didn't really 
>> work out.
>> In reading the procedure in the T-4XB manual, where they're telling you to 
>> adjust C61 until the 
>> tweets zero out, I finally figured that you're listening to the carrier 
>> oscillator by putting the 
>> RF tuning onto that other peak you hear on the 80m band.  I also figured out 
>> that you had to 
>> adjust the GAIN control while in SPOT until you could hear it.
>> And yet, it seems I'm still calling and nobody's answering.  Is it just 
>> weird band conditions 
>> tonight or is there another way that I could have misaligned the receiver?  
>> I am assuming the 
>> transmitter is okay because the PO was using it with no trouble.  It could 
>> be a bad assumption, 
>> but it also seems more "right" that C61 is now more midrange than it was 
>> before (MUCH more 
>> midrange)...
>> 73,
>> Steve Wedge, W1ES/4
>> "I can't complain, but sometimes I still do."
>> - Joe Walsh
>> If the above message appears, it came from Steve's Son of Laptop!
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Drakelist mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


_______________________________________________
Drakelist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist

Reply via email to