The same with SBCL-1.0.34 and USOCKET 0.4.1 release. But I think a new USOCKET 0.4.2 bugfix release is needed, we have reached a another release cycle.
--binghe 在 2010-1-8，07:24， Chun Tian (binghe) 写道： > Hi, Erik (and Drakma users) > > (I'm not in Drakma mailing list until now) > > I just check latest Drakma (1.1.0) build with SBCL 1.0.33 and USOCKET (trunk > and 0.4.x branch), it works just fine with a test (drakma:http-request > "http://www.gnu.org/";). And I checked related USOCKET code, nothing strange > found. > > I don't know why Fred Gibson think (:nodelay t) are not supported on USOCKET > with SBCL. Maybe he's using too old version of either USOCKET or SBCL ... > more version details needed. > > Regards, > > Chun Tian (binghe) > > 在 2010-1-8，05:27， Erik Huelsmann 写道： > >> Did we (usocket developers) miss a function argument? >> >> Chun, shouldn't we at least accept it? >> >> Bye, >> >> Erik. >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Fred Gibson <f...@streamfocus.com> wrote: >>> I've found a small problem in Drakma's http-request where in a call to >>> usocket:socket-connect it sent the key :nodelay which doesn't exist >>> for sbcl's socket connect version, so I changed that call in drakma to >>> this: >>> >>> (usocket:socket-stream >>> (usocket:socket-connect host port >>> :element-type 'octet >>> #+:openmcl :deadline >>> #+:openmcl deadline >>> #-:sbcl :nodelay >>> #-:sbcl t)) >>> >>> Then it seemed to work just fine. >>> >>> My best, >>> >>> Fred Gibson >>> >>> Founder / Software Developer >>> http://www.streamfocus.com >>> >>> (c)2010 Organon Technologies LLC >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> drakma-devel mailing list >>> drakma-devel@common-lisp.net >>> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-devel >>> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ drakma-devel mailing list drakma-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-devel
