Hi Erik, On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Erik Huelsmann <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, there has been some development in usocket in the direction of > supporting timeouts. On platforms where timeouts are not supported, an > UNSUPPORTED-FEATURE condition is signalled. If that's ignored, > everything should just continue without the timeout settings. > > If the above is not good enough, could you indicate what more needs to > happen to make it so? I didn't know that usocket supports timeouts now. I was assuming it didn't because the OP resubmitted an old patch. >From your description it sounds as if this should be exactly what Drakma needs, so if someone wants to send a patch to integrate this usocket functionality (assuming this is in a released version) with Drakma, please go ahead. <http://weitz.de/patches.html> Thanks, Edi. _______________________________________________ drakma-devel mailing list drakma-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-devel
