On 11/18/2009 01:00 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 12:41 +0000, Mark Watts wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:39 +0100, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
wrote:
Mark Watts wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:56 +0100, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
wrote:
[...]
I'm wondering if there drbd supports a configuration of two nodes with
each two nic's in two separate lan's.
eg
- node 1 connected to lan x and lan y
- node 2 connected to lan x and lan y

The drbd syncs through both lan-s or fails over from lan x to lan y when
lan x fails.
[...]
When you say "two lans" do you mean two different IP Subnets (eth
192.168.1.0/24 and 172.16.1.0/24) or do you mean two layer-2 switches?

yes, two different subnets.
As I suggested in my previous email, I don't believe this is supported.
No need to.
Just use kernel bonding of the 2 interfaces to accomplish a "HA network
connection" and DRBD-sync over that.

        Bernd


Bonding don't solve what it's asking, the simple answer for this is "No, you can't do that".

Bonding only works if NIC's on both nodes are physically connected to the same switch and would be in the same network.

I suggest you get a different approach to solve your problem, you can use bonding but have to stick with only one network and physically connected to the same switch. And most probably you will only get HA not throughput.

Good luck.

--
Igor Neves<[email protected]>
3GNTW - Tecnologias de Informação, Lda

 SIP: [email protected]     JID: [email protected]
 ICQ: 249075444         MSN: [email protected]
 TLM: 00351914503611    PSTN: 00351252377120


_______________________________________________
drbd-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user

Reply via email to