Joseph L. Casale a écrit :
What about using both ?
Why, what would that accomplish?
It could be a way to allocated bandwidth per resource, but in case of
several resources need to synchronize, the global may be used for a
global limitation.
For example:
common {
syncer {
rate 20M;
[...]
}
[...]
}
resource r1
syncer {
rate 10M;
[...]
}
[...]
}
resource r2
syncer {
rate 15M;
[...]
}
[...]
}
So I define my maximum bandwidth at 20M in the common part. This is due
to my network.
Because of the limitation of the disks of r1, I define a bandwidth at
10M for this resource,
and because of the limitation of the disks of r2, I define a bandwidth
at 15M for this resource.
Thus:
- If r1 has to be synchronized, my bandwidth will be 10M.
- If r2 has to be synchronized, my bandwidth will be 15M.
- If r1 and r2 have to be synchronized, my bandwidth will be 20M (and
not 10+15=25M).
--
Hervé GAUTIER
_______________________________________________
drbd-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
