I'd be quite interested as well, obviously. So this is what we would end up with:
Host A is primary for drbd volume 1, and secondary for drbd volume 2. It acts as an iSCSI target for whatever's on volume 1. Host B is primary for volume 2, and secondary for volume 1. It acts as a target for whatever's on volume 2. If either node fails, the opposite node takes over the secondary volume, and exports its fallen comrade's iSCSI targets. This idea could possibly be extended with Ben's approach of one DRBD volume per iSCSI target. (Except that it would be in a primary/secondary role, instead of primary/primary.) This would make the process of rebalancing the load between the two nodes fairly trivial. Mike On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Bart Coninckx <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It is. I'm planning to showcase this in one of our upcoming webinars. >> >> Cheers, >> Florian >> > > Excellent, any timeframe on this? As it happens I'm dealing with a setup now > that could definitely benefit from this. > > B. > _______________________________________________ > drbd-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user > -- Dr. Michael Iverson Director of Information Technology Hatteras Printing _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
