> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:drbd-user- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Lars Ellenberg > Sent: mercredi 6 avril 2011 15:55 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] Fwd: DRBD primary/primary vs. VMFS3 ? > > > Which establishes that we have only _one_ iSCSI target on top of DRBD, > and this becomes a "classical" Single-Primary DRBD failover solution.
However, two nodes can have two DRBD resources each, with two iSCSI targets on top (each node exporting one of them, with cross failover to the other node using pacemaker for instance). That makes a nice dual active/passive setup, with some load balancing across the two nodes. The cost of that is that you end up with two datastores, instead of just one... I created a virtual SAN this way using two VMs, but I bet it would work the same on physical nodes... Cheers, - Patrick - ************************************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. [email protected] ************************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
