> You can disable the AL? News to me, but sounds good in your scenario. Look at the ChangeLog for 8.3.9. invalidate-remote implicitly disables it.
> If this works, why don't you go AL-less? Seeing as you don't want to use > a peer, there is nothing DRBD could do with its hot extents if it tried. see the error message in my first email: invalidate-remote only works with a connected peer or at least an inconsistent remote disk state. Regards, Mark -- The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt]. _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
