On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:52:03AM +0000, Oren Nechushtan wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > First, I would like to express my pleasure using DRBD! > Here is my situation: > > Two-node setup, using cman and pacemaker, don't care about quorum, no > stonithMaster-Slave DRBD resource > Fence resource only > I noticed that under certain settings (powering on/off nodes enough times) > the secondary node may never becomes promoted when primary is shutdown.
I *think* that is intentional, and preventing potential data divergence, in the following scenario: * all good, Primary --- connected --- Secondary * Kill Secondary, Primary continues. * Powerdown Primary. * Bring up Secondary only. What use is fencing, if a fencing loop would cause data divergence anyways. > Here is a sample log (attached) > > Jan 18 08:34:52 NODE-1 crmd: [2054]: info: do_lrm_rsc_op: Performing > key=7:89911:0:aac20e27-939f-439c-b461-e668262718b3 op=drbd_fsroot:0_promote_0 > ) > Jan 18 08:34:52 NODE-1 lrmd: [2051]: info: rsc:drbd_fsroot:0:299768: promote > Jan 18 08:34:52 NODE-1 kernel: block drbd0: helper command: /sbin/drbdadm > fence-peer minor-0 > Jan 18 08:34:52 NODE-1 corosync[1759]: [TOTEM ] Automatically recovered > ring 1 > Jan 18 08:34:53 NODE-1 crm-fence-peer.sh[24325]: invoked for fsroot > Jan 18 08:34:53 NODE-1 corosync[1759]: [TOTEM ] Automatically recovered > ring 1 > Jan 18 08:34:53 NODE-1 crm-fence-peer.sh[24325]: WARNING peer is unreachable, > my disk is Consistent: did not place the constraint! This is it. -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
