From: Lars Ellenberg <[email protected]> [snippage] > May I ask why you chose to use heartbeat haresource mode instead of > RHCS or Pacemaker, or any other potential candidate for the job? > > Just curious here. I'm trying to figure out how common it is nowadays > to do new haresources deployments with new projects.
The last time I tried pacemaker on a test cluster at work, it didn't work at all. This was apparently because multicast was required, and the people who run networking at work said they wouldn't turn multicast on for any of the switches. heartbeat, though, works reasonably well because it doesn't require multicast. FWIW, Marcel's haresources had "nfs nfslock", while a heartbeat-using NFS cluster here has "nfslock nfs" in the same place. The /etc/init.d/ scripts have chkconfig comments showing nfslock starting before nfs. So that's another thing for Marcel to look at. -- Matt G / Dances With Crows The Crow202 Blog: http://crow202.org/wordpress/ There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
