On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Felix Frank <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/25/2012 11:03 AM, Florian Haas wrote: >>>> fsck of your /dev/drbdX device, I hope? >>>> >> >>> > >>> > Yes, on the /dev/drbd0. Otherwise fsck would have thrown errors, right? >> Only if the filesystem had errors. :) You can always pretty much do >> anything with DRBD's backing device if DRBD isn't using it. > > Uhm, but then DRBD won't know about the fixes that fsck has applied, > right? Isn't this setting yourself up for inconsistent disks among your > nodes? > > One would probably want to do a verify after such stunts anyway, I presume.
Definitely, but the question was whether fsck would throw errors just from being run against a DRBD backing device. Which it wouldn't. Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
