3833 is a prime number.... and is smaller than 3843 but larger than 3389, I believe. But that's just math. I can't comment on any other constraint that explains why the examples use 3389.
Russ On 06/07/2012 12:35 AM, Felix Frank wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/06/2012 10:24 PM, Pascal BERTON wrote: >> Well, not a big deal, it effectively works fine with 3833… >> >> BTW, I’ve often seen references to a value of 3389 for it. Any reason >> for that ? Just a legacy value that DRBD users forgot to update ? Or is >> there any other reason for that ? >> > it's supposedly works best with prime numbers, and 3389 happens to be > the largest one in the supported range (?) > > Cheers, > Felix > _______________________________________________ > drbd-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
