On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:21:14 +0200 Felix Frank <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 05:19 PM, James Gibbon wrote: > > Is that right? > > Yes. > > I'd still consider losing the split brain resolution option. > Many thanks, Felix. This has all been a useful learning experience as well as a problem resolution resource. I'm going to run the fix shortly. One last question: why does /proc/drbd on the broken node show as "UpToDate" in /proc/drbd? Is that because it's a primary, and not able to communicate with the other side, therefore it's entitled to consider itself current? But provided it doesn't attempt to impose its version of "UpToDate" on the other half, I'm safe. James -- James Gibbon <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
