On 12 Oct 2017 5:10 am, "Gandalf Corvotempesta" < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote:
Previously i've asked about DRBDv9+ZFS. Let's assume a more "standard" setup with DRBDv8 + mdadm. What I would like to archieve is a simple redundant SAN. (anything preconfigured for this ?) Which is best, raid1+drbd+lvm or drbd+raid1+lvm? Any advantage by creating multiple drbd resources ? I think that a single DRBD resource is better for administrative point of view. A simple failover would be enough, I don't need master-master In that case you might go with raid -> lvm -> drbd -> lvm to benefit from lvm in both layers
_______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list drbd-user@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
