Il giorno ven 11 mag 2018 alle ore 11:58 Robert Altnoeder < [email protected]> ha scritto: > If it s supposed to become a storage system (e.g., one that is used by > the Hypervisors via NFS), then the whole thing is a different story, and > we may be talking about an active/passive NFS storage cluster that the > Hypervisors connect to. The setup mentioned above is probably still the > way to go with regard to the storage stack layout, however there could > obviously be a single large NFS volume, which would only be active > (accessible) on one of the storage nodes at a time.
In my case, this would be used for Maildir hosting. Multiple drbd resources would be unmanageable and useless, with Maildir i'll have a huge NFS server (maybe v3 to be stateless) in active/passive. Any short failure in terms of couple of seconds should be unnoticed by everyone (users, dovecot deliveries and so on) because all software are configured to retry some times. _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
