On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 10:23, Robert Altnoeder <[email protected]>
wrote:

You could try to resize the volume (volume-definition set-size) to match
> those 33587200 KiB that you see as the expected value, which will
> effectively make it somewhat larger than that. If the peer count is
> indeed different from what LINSTOR thinks it should be, that might cause
> a mismatch between the net size reported by LINSTOR and the actual net
> size, but it should at least make the volume usable until we can come up
> with a fix for any issues caused by different peer count.
>

That's fantastic! Thanks for the tip and for the explanation. Managed to
have some good progress after doing what you suggested...

Regards,
Yannis
_______________________________________________
drbd-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user

Reply via email to