Hi,
I have lots of experience skipping the initial sync with ZFS zvols and drbd
8.4.x. I have been using the "drbdadm -- --clear-bitmap new-current-uuid
<RESOURCE>" for years and never had a problem. This is why it works:
1. New ZFS volumes are guaranteed to return only zero data for unwritten
blocks, so two new volumes are always in sync, if they have not been written to.
2. Also, if you have a VM base image on two hosts, you can clone the volumes
in the image on each host and also skip the initial sync, because both clones
will be identical. Of course, I am asuming that the base image was replicated
via ZFS streams.
3. LVM volumes and most other volume types will not work well, because they
don't guarantee new volumes to be zero-filled. However, depending on your use
case, it is often better to zero-fill your volumes manually (E.G. cat /dev/zero
>/dev/vg/vol0) and skip the sync. It does not seem reasonable, but given the
storage and network characteristics at play, it could be much much better than
doing an actual DRBD sync.
4. If in doubt, run a drbd verify until you feel confidence in your process.
* Typical way to skip the sync (at least this is my proven method):
# drbdadm create-md <resource> - (do this on both nodes)
# drbdadm up <resource> - (do this on both nodes)
# drbdadm -- --clear-bitmap new-current-uuid <resource> - (do this on
secondary node)
# drbdadm primary <resource> - (do this on primary node)
# cat /proc/drbd - (Enjoy!)
In my opinion, having to replicate multi-tb volumes is an incredible waste
of time and resources, if it can be safely avoided. I've talked to many people
that patiently wait while their giant 4 TB VM volumes do their initial sync and
hog their environment's I/O in the process...
I hope this helps you and others out there who are looking for a better way...
David
--
David Bruzos (Systems Administrator)
Jacksonville Port Authority
2831 Talleyrand Ave.
Jacksonville, FL 32206
Cell: (904) 625-0969
Office: (904) 357-3069
Email: [email protected]
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:18:54PM -0400, digimer wrote:
> On 2018-08-28 12:59 PM, Julien Escario wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Just wanted to know : is there a way to get rid of initial sync with
> > linstor and
> > zfs backend ?
> > Right now, I have a 1TB volume to create and initial sync is veeeery long.
> >
> > I think it's mostly due to unavailability of thinly provisionned ZFS
> > resources
> > but perhaps is there a way to suspend resync and ask the system to simply
> > consider both resources as sync'ed ?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Julien
>
> In 8.4, you could do 'drbdadm new-current-uuid --clear-bitmap <res>'. Be
> aware though; The bits won't match until/unless a given block is
> written. So a 'verify' will be problematic.
>
> digimer
> _______________________________________________
> drbd-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
--
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Please note that under Florida's public records law (F.S. 668.6076), most
written communications
to or from the Jacksonville Port Authority are
public records, available to the public and media
upon request. Your email
communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and
delete immediately
without forwarding to others.
_______________________________________________
drbd-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
