On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 17:55 +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:57:10PM +1000, 
> christopher.halse.rog...@canonical.com wrote:
> > From: Christopher James Halse Rogers 
> > <christopher.halse.rog...@canonical.com>
> > 
> > v2: Also pull out the drm_vblank_put call.
> > Signed-off-by: Christopher James Halse Rogers 
> > <christopher.halse.rog...@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c |   44 
> > ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> >  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > index 982ca8c..da56685 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > @@ -931,6 +931,20 @@ void drm_vblank_put(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vblank_put);
> >  
> > +static void drm_emit_vblank_event (struct drm_device *dev,
> > +                              struct drm_pending_vblank_event *e,
> > +                              unsigned int seq, struct timeval *now)
> > +{
> > +   e->event.sequence = seq;
> > +   e->event.tv_sec = now->tv_sec;
> > +   e->event.tv_usec = now->tv_usec;
> > +   drm_vblank_put(dev, e->pipe);
> > +   list_move_tail(&e->base.link, &e->base.file_priv->event_list);
> > +   wake_up_interruptible(&e->base.file_priv->event_wait);
> > +   trace_drm_vblank_event_delivered(e->base.pid, e->pipe,
> > +                                    e->event.sequence);
> > +}
> > +
> >  void drm_vblank_off(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
> >  {
> >     struct drm_pending_vblank_event *e, *t;
> > @@ -951,14 +965,7 @@ void drm_vblank_off(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
> >                       wanted %d, current %d\n",
> >                       e->event.sequence, seq);
> >  
> > -           e->event.sequence = seq;
> > -           e->event.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
> > -           e->event.tv_usec = now.tv_usec;
> > -           drm_vblank_put(dev, e->pipe);
> > -           list_move_tail(&e->base.link, &e->base.file_priv->event_list);
> > -           wake_up_interruptible(&e->base.file_priv->event_wait);
> > -           trace_drm_vblank_event_delivered(e->base.pid, e->pipe,
> > -                                            e->event.sequence);
> > +           drm_emit_vblank_event(dev, e, seq, &now);
> >     }
> >  
> >     WARN_ON(atomic_read(&dev->vblank_refcount[crtc]) != 0);
> > @@ -1104,18 +1111,10 @@ static int drm_queue_vblank_event(struct drm_device 
> > *dev, int pipe,
> >                                   vblwait->request.sequence);
> >  
> >     e->event.sequence = vblwait->request.sequence;
> > +   list_add_tail(&e->base.link, &dev->vblank_event_list);
> 
> Is &dev->vblank_event_list == &e->base.file_priv->event_list?
> If they are not equal this is changing the behavior...

This gets moved to e->base.file_priv->event_list in
drm_emit_vblank_event ().  So it's doing a bit of useless work setting a
couple of pointers, but this doesn't change the behaviour.

> 
> >     if ((seq - vblwait->request.sequence) <= (1 << 23)) {
> > -           e->event.sequence = seq;
> > -           e->event.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
> > -           e->event.tv_usec = now.tv_usec;
> > -           drm_vblank_put(dev, pipe);
> > -           list_add_tail(&e->base.link, &e->base.file_priv->event_list);
> > -           wake_up_interruptible(&e->base.file_priv->event_wait);
> > -           vblwait->reply.sequence = seq;
> 
> Is it OK to drop this substitution?

Ahem.  No, it's not.  That's an overzealous delete key going off.  Hm.
Either the clients I was testing don't care about the reply, or the
clients I was testing always set _DRM_BLANK_NEXTONMISS.  I think it's
the latter.

Updated patch coming.

> 
> > -           trace_drm_vblank_event_delivered(current->pid, pipe,
> > -                                            vblwait->request.sequence);
> > +           drm_emit_vblank_event(dev, e, seq, &now);
> >     } else {
> > -           list_add_tail(&e->base.link, &dev->vblank_event_list);
> >             vblwait->reply.sequence = vblwait->request.sequence;
> >     }
> >  
> > @@ -1249,14 +1248,7 @@ void drm_handle_vblank_events(struct drm_device 
> > *dev, int crtc)
> >             DRM_DEBUG("vblank event on %d, current %d\n",
> >                       e->event.sequence, seq);
> >  
> > -           e->event.sequence = seq;
> > -           e->event.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
> > -           e->event.tv_usec = now.tv_usec;
> > -           drm_vblank_put(dev, e->pipe);
> > -           list_move_tail(&e->base.link, &e->base.file_priv->event_list);
> > -           wake_up_interruptible(&e->base.file_priv->event_wait);
> > -           trace_drm_vblank_event_delivered(e->base.pid, e->pipe,
> > -                                            e->event.sequence);
> > +           drm_emit_vblank_event(dev, e, seq, &now);
> >     }
> >  
> >     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> > -- 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to