On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 02:46:28PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com 
wrote:
> From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> 
> If the vblank irq has already been disabled (via the disable timer) when
> we call drm_vblank_off() sample the counter and timestamp one last time.
> This will make the sure that the user space visible counter will account
> for time between vblank irq disable and drm_vblank_off().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> index e12cf69..bb64f0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,19 @@ static void vblank_disable_and_save(struct drm_device 
> *dev, int crtc)
>        */
>       spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vblank_time_lock, irqflags);
>  
> +     /*
> +      * If the vblank interrupt was already disbled update the count
> +      * and timestamp to maintain the appearance that the counter
> +      * has been ticking all along until this time. This makes the
> +      * count account for the entire time between drm_vblank_on() and
> +      * drm_vblank_off().
> +      */
> +     if (!dev->vblank[crtc].enabled) {
> +             drm_update_vblank_count(dev, crtc);
> +             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vblank_time_lock, irqflags);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
>       dev->driver->disable_vblank(dev, crtc);
>       dev->vblank[crtc].enabled = false;
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.5.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

Reply via email to