From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>

I wasn't sure if TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN works correctly with non-0 lpfn, but
AFAICT it does.

Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
index 9c92976..d23b0dd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
@@ -179,9 +179,7 @@ void radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain(struct radeon_bo 
*rbo, u32 domain)
         * improve fragmentation quality.
         * 512kb was measured as the most optimal number.
         */
-       if (!((rbo->flags & RADEON_GEM_CPU_ACCESS) &&
-             (rbo->placements[i].flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM)) &&
-           rbo->tbo.mem.size > 512 * 1024) {
+       if (rbo->tbo.mem.size > 512 * 1024) {
                for (i = 0; i < c; i++) {
                        rbo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN;
                }
-- 
2.1.1

Reply via email to