On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:23:55PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > Op 07-04-15 om 16:19 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:56:07PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> If kref_put_mutex returns true then the caller or the put function is > >> responsible > >> for unlocking the mutex. > > This patch introduces the kref_put_mutex() usage, so this commit > > message is rather confusing. > > > This was because of the confusion that happened when doing the same in > i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked, so I thought I would mention it > explicitly in the commit message. :-)
I've added a bit more text to make it clearer and applied the patch to topic/drm-misc. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
