2015ë 12ì 08ì¼ 10:47ì Krzysztof Kozlowski ì´(ê°) ì´ ê¸: > On 08.12.2015 10:33, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Hello Krzysztof, >> >> On 12/07/2015 09:45 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 07.12.2015 21:52, Inki Dae wrote: >>>> From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at osg.samsung.com> >>>> >>>> The DT binding for the Exynos DRM Display Port (DP) driver isn't consistent >>>> since it uses a phandle to describe the connection between the DP port and >>>> the display panel but uses the OF graph ports and endpoints to describe the >>>> connection betwen the DP port, a bridge chip and the panel. >>>> >>>> The Exynos DP driver and the DT binding have been changed to allow also to >>>> describe the DP port to panel connection using ports / endpoints (OF graph) >>>> so this patch changes the Exynos5800 Peach Pi DT to make it consistent with >>>> the Exynos5420 Peach Pit that has a eDP to LVDS chip and uses OF graph too. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at osg.samsung.com> >>>> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at osg.samsung.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 15 ++++++++++++++- >>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>> >>> Looks sensible: >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com> >>> >>> Dependencies are not mentioned, does it depend on patch 1? >>> >> >> Yes, it depends on patch 1/4 so it should be merged through the Exynos DRM >> tree to maintain bisectability. Inki's patch maintains the DT ABI backward >> compatibility though so another option is to wait until the DRM change hit >> mainline and then pick $SUBJECT. > > Thanks. We could also use a tag with DRM changes for samsung-soc but > since I already flushed my queue for v4.5 I think it would be an > overkill. From my point of view it can safely go through exynos-drm tree.
I will pick it up to exynos-drm tree. :) Thanks, Inki Dae > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > >
