On 05/22/2015 05:02 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
>
> Rip out the check from exynos_update_plane() and create
> exynos_check_plane() for the check phase enabling use to use
> the atomic helpers to call our check and update phases when updating
> planes.
>
> Update all users of exynos_update_plane() accordingly to call
> exynos_check_plane() before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c | 29 +++++++++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.c | 40
> +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c
> index 9006b94..61b8cfe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ static int exynos_drm_crtc_mode_set_base(struct drm_crtc
> *crtc, int x, int y,
> struct drm_framebuffer *fb = crtc->primary->fb;
> unsigned int crtc_w;
> unsigned int crtc_h;
> + int ret;
>
> /* when framebuffer changing is requested, crtc's dpms should be on */
> if (exynos_crtc->dpms > DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) {
> @@ -123,11 +124,16 @@ static int exynos_drm_crtc_mode_set_base(struct
> drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y,
> return -EPERM;
> }
>
> + ret = exynos_check_plane(crtc->primary, fb);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> crtc_w = fb->width - x;
> crtc_h = fb->height - y;
> + exynos_update_plane(crtc->primary, crtc, fb, 0, 0,
> + crtc_w, crtc_h, x, y, crtc_w, crtc_h);
>
> - return exynos_update_plane(crtc->primary, crtc, fb, 0, 0,
> - crtc_w, crtc_h, x, y, crtc_w, crtc_h);
I still think to need "[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix source data argument for
plane" before merged atomic patches for bisect.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-April/081368.html
Thanks.
