On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 06:44:08PM +0300, Mikko Perttunen wrote: > On 05/21/2015 06:10 PM, Arto Merilainen wrote: > >... > >>>+ > >>>+ vic->rst = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "vic03"); > >> > >>I might prefer just "vic" as the clock/reset name. The name is often > >>used as a sort of "role" for the clock/reset for the device, not > >>necessarily the raw name of the "correct" clock/reset. > >> > > > >I considered that - but I then noticed that > >drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124.c was already using vic03 variant. I can > >write a patch for changing that too. > > Well, the two can be different; the clock-name in device tree kind of means > "string that i use to refer to a clock that powers the VIC unit". It's not > really a big deal though, both ways are used in DT bindings.
I'll insist on calling this vic in the clock-names property. The 03 is as far as I can tell an encoding of the version number, so if you want to call this vic04 in some future version we'll have to needlessly patch the driver. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150522/1582c555/attachment-0001.sig>
