On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:27:59PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> 
> When running in HDMI mode, the sor1 IP block needs to use the sor1_src
> as parent clock, and in turn configure the sor1_src to use pll_d2_out0
> as its parent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c
> index 6887e52318e2..7405c39f6db3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c
> @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ struct tegra_sor {
>       struct clk *clk_parent;
>       struct clk *clk_brick;
>       struct clk *clk_safe;
> +     struct clk *clk_src;
>       struct clk *clk_dp;
>       struct clk *clk;
>  
> @@ -2140,7 +2141,11 @@ static void tegra_sor_hdmi_enable(struct drm_encoder 
> *encoder)
>       tegra_sor_writel(sor, 0x00000000, SOR_XBAR_POL);
>  
>       /* switch to parent clock */
> -     err = tegra_sor_set_parent_clock(clk, sor->clk_parent);
> +     err = clk_set_parent(sor->clk_src, sor->clk_parent);
> +     if (err < 0)
> +             dev_err(sor->dev, "failed to set source clock: %d\n", err);
> +
> +     err = tegra_sor_set_parent_clock(sor, sor->clk_src);
>       if (err < 0)
>               dev_err(sor->dev, "failed to set parent clock: %d\n", err);
>  
> @@ -2645,6 +2650,13 @@ static int tegra_sor_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>               goto remove;
>       }
>  
> +     sor->clk_src = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "source");
> +     if (IS_ERR(sor->clk_src)) {
> +             err = PTR_ERR(sor->clk_src);
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get source clock: %d\n", err);
> +             goto remove;

Shouldn't this fallback to current behavior without this clock?

> +     }
> +
>       sor->clk_parent = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "parent");
>       if (IS_ERR(sor->clk_parent)) {
>               err = PTR_ERR(sor->clk_parent);
> -- 
> 2.8.3
> 

Reply via email to