On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel <sre at kernel.org> wrote: > As I said: I did use 864 initially. That results in missing pixels.
Sorry, I didn't mean to question this. Go with what works, not with some old fart's ramblings! > I _think_, that your HW team decided to cover the first and the > last few pixels of the 864 display with plastic. So technically > it's a 864 display, but effectively it's 854. (*shudder* at "your HW team" ;) It's plausible, the covers did change slightly for the developer edition. Good luck with the upstreaming efforts! BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
