On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:10:56PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> DisplayPort branch device may define max supported bits per
> component. Update display info based on this value if bpc
> is defined.
> 
> v2: cleanup to match the drm_dp_helper.c patches introduced
>     earlier in this series
> v3: Fill bpc for connector's display info in separate
>     drm_dp_helper function (Daniel)
> v4: remove updating bpc for display info as it may be overridden
>     when parsing EDID. Instead, check bpc for DP branch device
>     during compute_config
> v5: Indentation fixes (Jim Bride)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 8f17c88..69cee9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1524,6 +1524,20 @@ void intel_dp_compute_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, 
> int port_clock,
>       }
>  }
>  
> +int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +                      struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> +{
> +     int bpp, bpc;
> +
> +     bpp = pipe_config->pipe_bpp;
> +     bpc = drm_dp_downstream_max_bpc(intel_dp->dpcd, 
> intel_dp->downstream_ports);
> +
> +     if (bpc > 0)
> +             bpp = min(bpp, 3*bpc);
> +
> +     return bpp;
> +}
> +
>  bool
>  intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>                       struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> @@ -1590,7 +1604,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>       /* Walk through all bpp values. Luckily they're all nicely spaced with 2
>        * bpc in between. */
> -     bpp = pipe_config->pipe_bpp;
> +     bpp = intel_dp_compute_bpp(intel_dp, pipe_config);
>       if (is_edp(intel_dp)) {
>  
>               /* Get bpp from vbt only for panels that dont have bpp in edid 
> */
> -- 
> 2.7.4

Reply via email to