On 01/25/2017 11:56 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
I just learned that &struct_name.member_name works and looks pretty
even. It doesn't (yet) link to the member directly though, which would
be really good for big structures or vfunc tables (where the
per-member kerneldoc tends to be long).

Also some minor drive-by polish where it makes sense, I read a lot
of docs ...

This seems like a leftover from the older version of the patch, which
we decided to not take. I guess we could drop it.

Archit


Cc: Archit Taneja <arch...@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
---
 include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
index fdd82fcbf168..1595a57dfbf2 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
@@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
         * True if an acceptable configuration is possible, false if the modeset
         * operation should be rejected.
         */
-       bool (*mode_fixup)(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
-                          const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
-                          struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode);
+       bool (*mode_fixup)(struct drm_bridge *bridge, const struct
+                          drm_display_mode *mode, struct drm_display_mode
+                          *adjusted_mode);
        /**
         * @disable:
         *


--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to