On 01/31/17 17:46, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > Jyri Sarha <jsa...@ti.com> writes: > >> Fix badly hardcoded return return value from under fail-label. All >> goto branches to the label set the "ret"-variable accordingly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsa...@ti.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c >> index 3a763f7..fa9fff3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c >> @@ -1027,5 +1027,5 @@ int tilcdc_crtc_create(struct drm_device *dev) >> >> fail: >> tilcdc_crtc_destroy(crtc); >> - return -ENOMEM; >> + return -ret; > > Hi, > > Shouldn't it read ret instead of -ret? The places that set ret > already make it negative, while turning it positive looks like would > fail the verification done by the caller. >
Argh.. sorry. I fixed it already in my branch but forgot to format the patch again... I'll do another version. Thanks, Jyro _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
