On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:47:49PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Bypass all the spinlocks and return the last timestamp and counter from
> the last vblank if the driver delcares that it is accurate (and stable
> across on/off), and the vblank is currently enabled.
> 
> This is dependent upon the both the hardware and driver to provide the
> proper barriers to facilitate reading our bookkeeping outside of the
> vblank interrupt and outside of the explicit vblank locks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>,
> Cc: Mario Kleiner <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> index 4cc9352ab6a8..b4bd361a2bcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> @@ -1562,6 +1562,17 @@ static int drm_queue_vblank_event(struct drm_device 
> *dev, unsigned int pipe,
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static bool drm_wait_vblank_is_query(union drm_wait_vblank *vblwait)
> +{
> +     if (vblwait->request.sequence)
> +             return false;
> +
> +     return _DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE ==
> +             (vblwait->request.type & (_DRM_VBLANK_TYPES_MASK |
> +                                       _DRM_VBLANK_EVENT |
> +                                       _DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS));
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Wait for VBLANK.
>   *
> @@ -1611,6 +1622,21 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  
>       vblank = &dev->vblank[pipe];
>  
> +     /* If the counter is currently enabled and accurate, short-circuit 
> queries
> +      * to return the cached timestamp of the last vblank.
> +      */
> +     if (dev->vblank_disable_immediate &&
> +         drm_wait_vblank_is_query(vblwait) &&
> +         vblank->enabled) {
> +             struct timeval now;
> +

Do we want a comment here as well stating that the seqlock
already has the rmb?

> +             vblwait->reply.sequence =
> +                     drm_vblank_count_and_time(dev, pipe, &now);
> +             vblwait->reply.tval_sec = now.tv_sec;
> +             vblwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_usec;
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +
>       ret = drm_vblank_get(dev, pipe);
>       if (ret) {
>               DRM_DEBUG("crtc %d failed to acquire vblank counter, %d\n", 
> pipe, ret);
> -- 
> 2.11.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to