On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:22:31AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > On 03/22/2017 10:50 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > It's been around forever, no one bothered to address the FIXME, so I > > presume it's all fine. > > > > Cc: Sinclair Yeh <s...@vmware.com> > > Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellst...@vmware.com> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com> > > NAK. We need to properly address this. Probably as part of the atomic > update.
So could someone with vmwgfx understanding explain this? Note that the FIXME was originally added by me years ago, because I wasn't sure (only about 90%) that this is safe, and was essentially pleading for a vmwgfx expert to review this? Since it didn't happen I presume it's not that terribly and probably safe ... I'm still 90% sure that this is correct, but I'd love for a vmwgfx to audit it. Replying with a NAK is kinda not the response I was hoping for (and yes I guess I should have explained what's going on here better, but it's just a git blame of the FIXME comment away). Thanks, Daniel > /Thomas > > > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 25 ------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c > > index d492d57d5309..424b3fc57203 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c > > @@ -148,15 +148,6 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_set2(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > struct drm_file *file_priv, > > s32 hotspot_x, hotspot_y; > > int ret; > > > > - /* > > - * FIXME: Unclear whether there's any global state touched by the > > - * cursor_set function, especially vmw_cursor_update_position looks > > - * suspicious. For now take the easy route and reacquire all locks. We > > - * can do this since the caller in the drm core doesn't check anything > > - * which is protected by any looks. > > - */ > > - drm_modeset_unlock_crtc(crtc); > > - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev_priv->dev); > > hotspot_x = hot_x + du->hotspot_x; > > hotspot_y = hot_y + du->hotspot_y; > > > > @@ -224,9 +215,6 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_set2(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > struct drm_file *file_priv, > > } > > > > out: > > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev_priv->dev); > > - drm_modeset_lock_crtc(crtc, crtc->cursor); > > - > > return ret; > > } > > > > @@ -239,25 +227,12 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_move(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > int x, int y) > > du->cursor_x = x + du->set_gui_x; > > du->cursor_y = y + du->set_gui_y; > > > > - /* > > - * FIXME: Unclear whether there's any global state touched by the > > - * cursor_set function, especially vmw_cursor_update_position looks > > - * suspicious. For now take the easy route and reacquire all locks. We > > - * can do this since the caller in the drm core doesn't check anything > > - * which is protected by any looks. > > - */ > > - drm_modeset_unlock_crtc(crtc); > > - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev_priv->dev); > > - > > vmw_cursor_update_position(dev_priv, shown, > > du->cursor_x + du->hotspot_x + > > du->core_hotspot_x, > > du->cursor_y + du->hotspot_y + > > du->core_hotspot_y); > > > > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev_priv->dev); > > - drm_modeset_lock_crtc(crtc, crtc->cursor); > > - > > return 0; > > } > > > > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
