On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:36 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 28-03-17 om 09:01 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > <snip>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 68cded453882..43dbad62786e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -12463,6 +12463,11 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device
> > *dev,
> > ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, state);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > + /* enocder->atomic_check might upgrade some crtc to a full modeset */
> > + ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, state);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> >
> > for_each_oldnew_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, crtc_state,
> > i) {
> > struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config =
>
> I know this patch has been applied, but this hunk is completely unrelated.
>
> Can I get a R-B on reverting it?
>
> ---->8----
> v2 of the commit 2c77bb29d398 ("drm: simplify the locking in the GETCRTC
> ioctl")
> accidentally introduced a unrelated change in intel_display.c, revert the
> unrelated change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: 2c77bb29d398 ("drm: simplify the locking in the GETCRTC ioctl")
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index baa8d836c8e7..c45694abda5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -12478,11 +12478,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, state);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - /* enocder->atomic_check might upgrade some crtc to a full modeset */
> - ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, state);
Noticed this while testing my driver-private object series.
drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset->atomic_release() getting called twice
within an atomic_check() broke the vcpi slots bookkeeping I had and
ironically exposed a bug in my code.
Reported-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
>
> for_each_oldnew_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, crtc_state,
> i) {
> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config =
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
