On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 02:04:24PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Friday 12 May 2017 17:06:14 Jose Abreu wrote: > > On 12-05-2017 10:35, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Tuesday 09 May 2017 18:00:12 Jose Abreu wrote: > > >> + if (mode->status == MODE_OK) > > >> + mode->status = > > >> drm_mode_validate_connector(connector, > > >> > > >> > > >> mode); > > > > > > I would reverse the arguments order to match the style of the other > > > validation functions. > > > > Hmm, I think it makes more sense to pass connector first and then > > mode ... > > I disagree, as this function validates a mode against a pipeline, the same > way > the other validation functions validate a mode against other parameters, but > it's your patch :-)
Call it drm_connector_validate_mode, because the first argument is generally the object we operate on :-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
