Bonjour Laurent! I was wondering why you choose to name the lvds-encoder.c driver like so. (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/67cc3e22b00f9027eaa0902ecf52ac5f4f5cac97)
The driver is clearly a drm_bridge, nested in the drm/bridge subdir... so why not "lvds-bridge.c"? Also, the associated bindings document is named "lvds-transmitter.txt", how confusing is that? Just wondering if it was intended and if not, whether a patch to harmonize all that would be welcomed. Cheers! _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
